[PATCH 5/6] add smppflock03 test case
WeiY
wei.a.yang at gmail.com
Sun Aug 25 13:45:45 UTC 2013
---
testsuites/smptests/smppflock02/init.c | 2 +-
testsuites/smptests/smppflock03/Makefile.am | 19 +
testsuites/smptests/smppflock03/init.c | 495 +++++++++++++++++++++++
testsuites/smptests/smppflock03/smppflock03.doc | 17 +
testsuites/smptests/smppflock03/smppflock03.scn | 53 +++
5 files changed, 585 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 testsuites/smptests/smppflock03/Makefile.am
create mode 100644 testsuites/smptests/smppflock03/init.c
create mode 100644 testsuites/smptests/smppflock03/smppflock03.doc
create mode 100644 testsuites/smptests/smppflock03/smppflock03.scn
diff --git a/testsuites/smptests/smppflock02/init.c b/testsuites/smptests/smppflock02/init.c
index 50050f0..58f6ab9 100644
--- a/testsuites/smptests/smppflock02/init.c
+++ b/testsuites/smptests/smppflock02/init.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ typedef struct {
} global_context;
static global_context context = {
- .state = ATOMIC_VAR_INITIALIZER(INITIAL),
+ .state = ATOMIC_INITIALIZER_UINT(INITIAL),
.lock = SMP_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER
};
diff --git a/testsuites/smptests/smppflock03/Makefile.am b/testsuites/smptests/smppflock03/Makefile.am
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1b0a04d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testsuites/smptests/smppflock03/Makefile.am
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+rtems_tests_PROGRAMS = smppflock03
+smppflock03_SOURCES = init.c ../../support/src/locked_print.c
+
+dist_rtems_tests_DATA = smppflock03.scn smppflock03.doc
+
+include $(RTEMS_ROOT)/make/custom/@RTEMS_BSP at .cfg
+include $(top_srcdir)/../automake/compile.am
+include $(top_srcdir)/../automake/leaf.am
+
+AM_CPPFLAGS += -I$(top_srcdir)/../support/include
+
+LINK_OBJS = $(smppflock03_OBJECTS)
+LINK_LIBS = $(smppflock03_LDLIBS)
+
+smppflock03$(EXEEXT): $(smppflock03_OBJECTS) $(smppflock03_DEPENDENCIES)
+ @rm -f smppflock03$(EXEEXT)
+ $(make-exe)
+
+include $(top_srcdir)/../automake/local.am
diff --git a/testsuites/smptests/smppflock03/init.c b/testsuites/smptests/smppflock03/init.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..49c4d25
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testsuites/smptests/smppflock03/init.c
@@ -0,0 +1,495 @@
+#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
+ #include "config.h"
+#endif
+
+#include <rtems.h>
+#include <rtems/score/smprwlock.h>
+
+#include "tmacros.h"
+
+/* FIXME: Add barrier to Score */
+
+typedef struct {
+ Atomic_Uint value;
+ Atomic_Uint sense;
+} barrier_control;
+
+typedef struct {
+ uint_fast32_t sense;
+} barrier_state;
+
+#define BARRIER_CONTROL_INITIALIZER { ATOMIC_INITIALIZER_UINT(0), ATOMIC_INITIALIZER_UINT(0) }
+
+#define BARRIER_STATE_INITIALIZER { 0 }
+
+static void barrier_wait(
+ barrier_control *control,
+ barrier_state *state,
+ int cpu_count
+)
+{
+ uint_fast32_t sense = ~state->sense;
+
+ state->sense = sense;
+
+ _Atomic_Fetch_add_uint(&control->value, 1, ATOMIC_ORDER_ACQUIRE);
+
+ if (_Atomic_Load_uint(&control->value, ATOMIC_ORDER_ACQUIRE) == cpu_count) {
+ _Atomic_Store_uint(&control->value, 0, ATOMIC_ORDER_RELEASE);
+ _Atomic_Store_uint(&control->sense, sense, ATOMIC_ORDER_RELEASE);
+ }
+
+ while (_Atomic_Load_uint(&control->sense, ATOMIC_ORDER_ACQUIRE) != sense) {
+ /* Wait */
+ }
+}
+
+#define TASK_PRIORITY 1
+
+#define CPU_COUNT 32
+
+#define TEST_COUNT 10
+
+typedef enum {
+ INITIAL,
+ START_TEST,
+ STOP_TEST
+} states;
+
+typedef struct {
+ Atomic_Uint state;
+ barrier_control barrier;
+ rtems_id timer_id;
+ rtems_interval timeout;
+ unsigned long read_counter[TEST_COUNT];
+ unsigned long write_counter[TEST_COUNT];
+ unsigned long test_read_counter[TEST_COUNT][CPU_COUNT];
+ unsigned long test_write_counter[TEST_COUNT][CPU_COUNT];
+ SMP_rwlock_Control lock;
+} global_context;
+
+static global_context context = {
+ .state = ATOMIC_INITIALIZER_UINT(INITIAL),
+ .barrier = BARRIER_CONTROL_INITIALIZER,
+ .lock = SMP_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER
+};
+
+static const char *test_names[TEST_COUNT] = {
+ "aquire global read lock with local counter",
+ "aquire global write lock with local counter",
+ "aquire global read lock with global counter",
+ "aquire global write lock with global counter",
+ "aquire local read lock with local counter",
+ "aquire local write lock with local counter",
+ "aquire local read lock with global counter",
+ "aquire local write lock with global counter",
+ "aquire global read lock with busy section",
+ "aquire global write lock with busy section"
+};
+
+static void stop_test_timer(rtems_id timer_id, void *arg)
+{
+ global_context *ctx = arg;
+
+ _Atomic_Store_uint(&ctx->state, STOP_TEST, ATOMIC_ORDER_RELEASE);
+}
+
+static void wait_for_state(global_context *ctx, uint_fast32_t desired_state)
+{
+ while (_Atomic_Load_uint(&ctx->state, ATOMIC_ORDER_ACQUIRE)
+ != desired_state) {
+ /* Wait */
+ }
+}
+
+static bool assert_state(global_context *ctx, uint_fast32_t desired_state)
+{
+ return _Atomic_Load_uint(&ctx->state, ATOMIC_ORDER_ACQUIRE) == desired_state;
+}
+
+typedef void (*test_body)(
+ int test,
+ global_context *ctx,
+ barrier_state *bs,
+ int cpu_count,
+ int cpu_self
+);
+
+static void test_0_body(
+ int test,
+ global_context *ctx,
+ barrier_state *bs,
+ int cpu_count,
+ int cpu_self
+)
+{
+ unsigned long counter = 0;
+
+ while (assert_state(ctx, START_TEST)) {
+ _SMP_rwlock_Acquire_read(&ctx->lock);
+ _SMP_rwlock_Release_read(&ctx->lock);
+ ++counter;
+ }
+ ctx->test_read_counter[test][cpu_self] = counter;
+}
+
+static void test_1_body(
+ int test,
+ global_context *ctx,
+ barrier_state *bs,
+ int cpu_count,
+ int cpu_self
+)
+{
+ unsigned long counter = 0;
+
+ while (assert_state(ctx, START_TEST)) {
+ _SMP_rwlock_Acquire_write(&ctx->lock);
+ _SMP_rwlock_Release_write(&ctx->lock);
+ ++counter;
+ }
+
+ ctx->test_write_counter[test][cpu_self] = counter;
+}
+
+static void test_2_body(
+ int test,
+ global_context *ctx,
+ barrier_state *bs,
+ int cpu_count,
+ int cpu_self
+)
+{
+ unsigned long counter = 0;
+
+ while (assert_state(ctx, START_TEST)) {
+ _SMP_rwlock_Acquire_read(&ctx->lock);
+ ++ctx->read_counter[test];
+ _SMP_rwlock_Release_read(&ctx->lock);
+ ++counter;
+ }
+
+ ctx->test_read_counter[test][cpu_self] = counter;
+}
+
+static void test_3_body(
+ int test,
+ global_context *ctx,
+ barrier_state *bs,
+ int cpu_count,
+ int cpu_self
+)
+{
+ unsigned long counter = 0;
+
+ while (assert_state(ctx, START_TEST)) {
+ _SMP_rwlock_Acquire_write(&ctx->lock);
+ ++ctx->write_counter[test];
+ _SMP_rwlock_Release_write(&ctx->lock);
+ ++counter;
+ }
+
+ ctx->test_write_counter[test][cpu_self] = counter;
+}
+
+static void test_4_body(
+ int test,
+ global_context *ctx,
+ barrier_state *bs,
+ int cpu_count,
+ int cpu_self
+)
+{
+ unsigned long counter = 0;
+ SMP_rwlock_Control lock = SMP_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER;
+
+ while (assert_state(ctx, START_TEST)) {
+ _SMP_rwlock_Acquire_read(&lock);
+ _SMP_rwlock_Release_read(&lock);
+ ++counter;
+ }
+
+ ctx->test_read_counter[test][cpu_self] = counter;
+}
+
+static void test_5_body(
+ int test,
+ global_context *ctx,
+ barrier_state *bs,
+ int cpu_count,
+ int cpu_self
+)
+{
+ unsigned long counter = 0;
+ SMP_rwlock_Control lock = SMP_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER;
+
+ while (assert_state(ctx, START_TEST)) {
+ _SMP_rwlock_Acquire_write(&lock);
+ _SMP_rwlock_Release_write(&lock);
+ ++counter;
+ }
+
+ ctx->test_write_counter[test][cpu_self] = counter;
+}
+
+static void test_6_body(
+ int test,
+ global_context *ctx,
+ barrier_state *bs,
+ int cpu_count,
+ int cpu_self
+)
+{
+ unsigned long counter = 0;
+ SMP_rwlock_Control lock = SMP_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER;
+
+ while (assert_state(ctx, START_TEST)) {
+ _SMP_rwlock_Acquire_read(&lock);
+
+ /* The counter value is not interesting, only the access to it */
+ ++ctx->read_counter[test];
+
+ _SMP_rwlock_Release_read(&lock);
+ ++counter;
+ }
+
+ ctx->test_read_counter[test][cpu_self] = counter;
+}
+
+static void test_7_body(
+ int test,
+ global_context *ctx,
+ barrier_state *bs,
+ int cpu_count,
+ int cpu_self
+)
+{
+ unsigned long counter = 0;
+ SMP_rwlock_Control lock = SMP_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER;
+
+ while (assert_state(ctx, START_TEST)) {
+ _SMP_rwlock_Acquire_write(&lock);
+
+ /* The counter value is not interesting, only the access to it */
+ ++ctx->write_counter[test];
+
+ _SMP_rwlock_Release_write(&lock);
+ ++counter;
+ }
+
+ ctx->test_write_counter[test][cpu_self] = counter;
+}
+
+static void busy_section(void)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 101; ++i) {
+ RTEMS_COMPILER_MEMORY_BARRIER();
+ }
+}
+
+static void test_8_body(
+ int test,
+ global_context *ctx,
+ barrier_state *bs,
+ int cpu_count,
+ int cpu_self
+)
+{
+ unsigned long counter = 0;
+
+ while (assert_state(ctx, START_TEST)) {
+ _SMP_rwlock_Acquire_read(&ctx->lock);
+ busy_section();
+ _SMP_rwlock_Release_read(&ctx->lock);
+ ++counter;
+ }
+
+ ctx->test_read_counter[test][cpu_self] = counter;
+}
+
+static void test_9_body(
+ int test,
+ global_context *ctx,
+ barrier_state *bs,
+ int cpu_count,
+ int cpu_self
+)
+{
+ unsigned long counter = 0;
+
+ while (assert_state(ctx, START_TEST)) {
+ _SMP_rwlock_Acquire_write(&ctx->lock);
+ busy_section();
+ _SMP_rwlock_Release_write(&ctx->lock);
+ ++counter;
+ }
+
+ ctx->test_write_counter[test][cpu_self] = counter;
+}
+
+static const test_body test_bodies[TEST_COUNT] = {
+ test_0_body,
+ test_1_body,
+ test_2_body,
+ test_3_body,
+ test_4_body,
+ test_5_body,
+ test_6_body,
+ test_7_body,
+ test_8_body,
+ test_9_body
+};
+
+static void run_tests(
+ global_context *ctx,
+ barrier_state *bs,
+ int cpu_count,
+ int cpu_self,
+ bool master
+)
+{
+ int test;
+
+ for (test = 0; test < TEST_COUNT; ++test) {
+ barrier_wait(&ctx->barrier, bs, cpu_count);
+ if (master) {
+ rtems_status_code sc = rtems_timer_fire_after(
+ ctx->timer_id,
+ ctx->timeout,
+ stop_test_timer,
+ ctx
+ );
+ rtems_test_assert(sc == RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL);
+
+ _Atomic_Store_uint(&ctx->state, START_TEST, ATOMIC_ORDER_RELEASE);
+ }
+
+ wait_for_state(ctx, START_TEST);
+
+ (*test_bodies[test])(test, ctx, bs, cpu_count, cpu_self);
+ }
+
+ barrier_wait(&ctx->barrier, bs, cpu_count);
+}
+
+static void task(rtems_task_argument arg)
+{
+ global_context *ctx = (global_context *) arg;
+ uint32_t cpu_count = rtems_smp_get_processor_count();
+ uint32_t cpu_self = rtems_smp_get_current_processor();
+ rtems_status_code sc;
+ barrier_state bs = BARRIER_STATE_INITIALIZER;
+
+ run_tests(ctx, &bs, cpu_count, cpu_self, false);
+
+ sc = rtems_task_suspend(RTEMS_SELF);
+ rtems_test_assert(sc == RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL);
+}
+
+static void test(void)
+{
+ global_context *ctx = &context;
+ SMP_rwlock_Control initialized = SMP_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER;
+ uint32_t cpu_count = rtems_smp_get_processor_count();
+ uint32_t cpu_self = rtems_smp_get_current_processor();
+ uint32_t cpu;
+ int test;
+ rtems_status_code sc;
+ barrier_state bs = BARRIER_STATE_INITIALIZER;
+
+ for (cpu = 0; cpu < cpu_count; ++cpu) {
+ if (cpu != cpu_self) {
+ rtems_id task_id;
+
+ sc = rtems_task_create(
+ rtems_build_name('T', 'A', 'S', 'K'),
+ TASK_PRIORITY,
+ RTEMS_MINIMUM_STACK_SIZE,
+ RTEMS_DEFAULT_MODES,
+ RTEMS_DEFAULT_ATTRIBUTES,
+ &task_id
+ );
+ rtems_test_assert(sc == RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL);
+
+ sc = rtems_task_start(task_id, task, (rtems_task_argument) ctx);
+ rtems_test_assert(sc == RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL);
+ }
+ }
+
+ ctx->timeout = 10 * rtems_clock_get_ticks_per_second();
+
+ sc = rtems_timer_create(rtems_build_name('T', 'I', 'M', 'R'), &ctx->timer_id);
+ rtems_test_assert(sc == RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL);
+
+ _SMP_rwlock_Initialize( &ctx->lock );
+ rtems_test_assert( memcmp( &ctx->lock, &initialized, sizeof( ctx->lock ) ) == 0 );
+
+ run_tests(ctx, &bs, cpu_count, cpu_self, true);
+
+ for (test = 0; test < TEST_COUNT; ++test) {
+ unsigned long sum_read = 0;
+ unsigned long sum_write = 0;
+
+ printf("%s\n", test_names[test]);
+
+ for (cpu = 0; cpu < cpu_count; ++cpu) {
+ unsigned long local_read_counter = ctx->test_read_counter[test][cpu];
+ unsigned long local_write_counter = ctx->test_write_counter[test][cpu];
+
+ sum_read += local_read_counter;
+ sum_write += local_write_counter;
+
+ printf(
+ "\tprocessor %" PRIu32 ", local read counter %lu, local write counter %lu\n",
+ cpu,
+ local_read_counter,
+ local_write_counter
+ );
+ }
+
+ printf(
+ "\tglobal read counter %lu, sum of local read counter %lu\n"
+ "\tglobal write counter %lu, sum of local write counter %lu\n",
+ ctx->read_counter[test],
+ sum_read,
+ ctx->write_counter[test],
+ sum_write
+ );
+ }
+}
+
+static void Init(rtems_task_argument arg)
+{
+ puts("\n\n*** TEST SMP phase_fair lock 3 ***");
+
+ test();
+
+ puts("*** END OF TEST SMP phase_fair lock 3 ***");
+
+ rtems_test_exit(0);
+}
+
+#define CONFIGURE_APPLICATION_NEEDS_CLOCK_DRIVER
+#define CONFIGURE_APPLICATION_NEEDS_CONSOLE_DRIVER
+
+#define CONFIGURE_SMP_APPLICATION
+
+#define CONFIGURE_SMP_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS CPU_COUNT
+
+#define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_TASKS CPU_COUNT
+
+#define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_SEMAPHORES 1
+
+#define CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_TIMERS 1
+
+#define CONFIGURE_INIT_TASK_PRIORITY TASK_PRIORITY
+#define CONFIGURE_INIT_TASK_INITIAL_MODES RTEMS_DEFAULT_MODES
+#define CONFIGURE_INIT_TASK_ATTRIBUTES RTEMS_DEFAULT_ATTRIBUTES
+
+#define CONFIGURE_RTEMS_INIT_TASKS_TABLE
+
+#define CONFIGURE_INIT
+
+#include <rtems/confdefs.h>
diff --git a/testsuites/smptests/smppflock03/smppflock03.doc b/testsuites/smptests/smppflock03/smppflock03.doc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9684860
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testsuites/smptests/smppflock03/smppflock03.doc
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+This file describes the directives and concepts tested by this test set.
+
+test set name: smppflock3
+
+The screen file was obtained on a PowerPC QorIQ P1020E target running with a
+processor frequency of 800MHz.
+
+directives:
+
+ - _SMP_rwlock_Acquire_write()
+ - _SMP_rwlock_Release_write()
+ - _SMP_rwlock_Acquire_read()
+ - _SMP_rwlock_Release_read()
+
+concepts:
+
+ - Benchmark the SMP phase_fair implementation
diff --git a/testsuites/smptests/smppflock03/smppflock03.scn b/testsuites/smptests/smppflock03/smppflock03.scn
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3833f16
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testsuites/smptests/smppflock03/smppflock03.scn
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+*** TEST SMP phase_fair lock 3 ***
+aquire global read lock with local counter
+ processor 0, local read counter 212584, local write counter 0
+ processor 1, local read counter 46, local write counter 0
+ global read counter 0, sum of local read counter 212630
+ global write counter 0, sum of local write counter 0
+aquire global write lock with local counter
+ processor 0, local read counter 0, local write counter 1
+ processor 1, local read counter 0, local write counter 69
+ global read counter 0, sum of local read counter 0
+ global write counter 0, sum of local write counter 70
+aquire global read lock with global counter
+ processor 0, local read counter 198117, local write counter 0
+ processor 1, local read counter 32, local write counter 0
+ global read counter 198149, sum of local read counter 198149
+ global write counter 0, sum of local write counter 0
+aquire global write lock with global counter
+ processor 0, local read counter 0, local write counter 105405
+ processor 1, local read counter 0, local write counter 64
+ global read counter 0, sum of local read counter 0
+ global write counter 105469, sum of local write counter 105469
+aquire local read lock with local counter
+ processor 0, local read counter 215001, local write counter 0
+ processor 1, local read counter 138, local write counter 0
+ global read counter 0, sum of local read counter 215139
+ global write counter 0, sum of local write counter 0
+aquire local write lock with local counter
+ processor 0, local read counter 0, local write counter 110001
+ processor 1, local read counter 0, local write counter 66
+ global read counter 0, sum of local read counter 0
+ global write counter 0, sum of local write counter 110067
+aquire local read lock with global counter
+ processor 0, local read counter 200213, local write counter 0
+ processor 1, local read counter 171, local write counter 0
+ global read counter 200384, sum of local read counter 200384
+ global write counter 0, sum of local write counter 0
+aquire local write lock with global counter
+ processor 0, local read counter 0, local write counter 105996
+ processor 1, local read counter 0, local write counter 74
+ global read counter 0, sum of local read counter 0
+ global write counter 106070, sum of local write counter 106070
+aquire global read lock with busy section
+ processor 0, local read counter 47420, local write counter 0
+ processor 1, local read counter 11, local write counter 0
+ global read counter 0, sum of local read counter 47431
+ global write counter 0, sum of local write counter 0
+aquire global write lock with busy section
+ processor 0, local read counter 0, local write counter 1
+ processor 1, local read counter 0, local write counter 37
+ global read counter 0, sum of local read counter 0
+ global write counter 0, sum of local write counter 38
+*** END OF TEST SMP phase_fair lock 3 ***
+
--
1.7.9.5
More information about the devel
mailing list