[PATCH 1/3] libcsupport: Add and use rtems_libio_iovec_eval()
Chris Johns
chrisj at rtems.org
Tue Dec 17 01:52:31 UTC 2013
On 17/12/2013 12:29 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Pass also zero-size buffers to the write handler since they may have
> side-effects for non-regular files, e.g. sending of an empty message.
I agree regular files should follow the standard with others being
unspecified. I do not think this patch does this.
> @@ -31,95 +29,31 @@ ssize_t writev(
> {
> ssize_t total;
> int v;
> - int bytes;
> rtems_libio_t *iop;
> - ssize_t old;
> - bool all_zeros;
>
> - rtems_libio_check_fd( fd );
> - iop = rtems_libio_iop( fd );
> - rtems_libio_check_is_open( iop );
> - rtems_libio_check_permissions_with_error( iop, LIBIO_FLAGS_WRITE, EBADF );
> -
> - /*
> - * Argument validation on IO vector
> - */
> - if ( !iov )
> - rtems_set_errno_and_return_minus_one( EINVAL );
> -
> - if ( iovcnt <= 0 )
> - rtems_set_errno_and_return_minus_one( EINVAL );
> -
> - if ( iovcnt > IOV_MAX )
> - rtems_set_errno_and_return_minus_one( EINVAL );
> -
> - /*
> - * OpenGroup says that you are supposed to return EINVAL if the
> - * sum of the iov_len values in the iov array would overflow a
> - * ssize_t.
> - *
> - * Also we would like to ensure that no IO is performed if there
> - * are obvious errors in the iovec. So this extra loop ensures
> - * that we do not do anything if there is an argument error.
> - *
> - * In addition,the OpenGroup specification says that if all the
> - * iov_len entries are zero, then the call has no effect. So
> - * this loop does that check as well and sets "all-zero" appropriately.
> - * The variable "all_zero" is used as an early exit point before
> - * entering the write loop.
> - */
> - all_zeros = true;
> - for ( old=0, total=0, v=0 ; v < iovcnt ; v++ ) {
> + total = rtems_libio_iovec_eval( fd, iov, iovcnt, LIBIO_FLAGS_WRITE, &iop );
>
> + if ( total >= 0 ) {
I am not sure about this...
> - /*
> - * A writev with all zeros is supposed to have no effect per OpenGroup.
> - */
> - if ( all_zeros == true ) {
> - return 0;
> - }
... as this statement is correct if the file is a regular file. I think
a check for a regular file is needed if the total is 0.
Chris
More information about the devel
mailing list