[rtems commit] tests: atomic support for RTEMS. Uniprocessor tests for atomic ops.

[yangwei weiyang]

I will add some ops-stubs to other architectures which are not
supported atomic functions now. It will pass the compiler problem but
atomic function will not be implemented really. Then it will not be  a
conditional API.

2013/2/13 Ralf Corsepius <ralf.corsepius at rtems.org>:
> On 02/08/2013 01:41 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Module:    rtems
>>> Branch:    master
>>> Commit:    fb9fa1537a9765eae90124e5db5770ae7a527d5e
>>> Changeset:
>>> http://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=fb9fa1537a9765eae90124e5db5770ae7a527d5e
>>>
>>> Author:    WeiY <wei.a.yang at gmail.com>
>>> Date:      Fri Jan 25 23:59:49 2013 +0800
>>>
>>> tests: atomic support for RTEMS. Uniprocessor tests for atomic ops.
>>>
>>
>> The tests do not compile for sis at least. Maybe broken for other
>> targets that do not have the atomics defined?
>
>
> RTEMS doesn't compile for all targets which do not have a file named
> rtems/score/cpuatomic.h.
>
> i.e. all targets but the powerpc and the i386.
>
>
>> In file included from
>> ../../../../../sis/lib/include/rtems/rtems/atomic.h:26:0,
>>                   from
>>
>> ../../../../../../../../rtems/c/src/../../testsuites/sptests/spatomic01/tasks.c:19:
>> ../../../../../sis/lib/include/rtems/score/atomic.h:21:35: fatal
>> error: rtems/score/cpuatomic.h: No such file or directory
>> compilation terminated.
>>
>> $> find cpukit/score -name cpuatomic.h
>> cpukit/score/cpu/i386/rtems/score/cpuatomic.h
>> cpukit/score/cpu/powerpc/rtems/score/cpuatomic.h
>>
>> We should have some kind of stubs so that non-supported architectures
>> will compile the atomic tests.
>
> Well, I agree to some extend, but ...
>
> ... I feel this is playing with symptoms.
>
> The actual issue behind all this, is the atomic-API currently being
> implemented as a conditional API - This is not good.
>
> I an ideal world, one would not have any conditional API, but would have a
> target-independent API.
>
> That said, unless this issue can be resolved, IMO, all the atomic headers
> should only be installed/pre-installed, if all ops and headers are
> implemented for a specific target - ATM, this does not apply.
>
> Ralf
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-devel mailing list
> rtems-devel at rtems.org
> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel



-- 
Wei Yang
Best Regards

wei.a.yang at gmail.com