[PATCH 1/2] libmm score and stubs
gedare at rtems.org
Wed Jul 24 16:50:14 UTC 2013
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Rempel, Cynthia
<cynt6007 at vandals.uidaho.edu> wrote:
>>From: gedare at gwmail.gwu.edu [gedare at gwmail.gwu.edu] on behalf of Gedare Bloom [gedare at rtems.org]
>>Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 9:19 AM
>>To: Rempel, Cynthia
>>Cc: Hesham AL-Matary; rtems-devel at rtems.org
>>Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] libmm score and stubs
>>On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Rempel, Cynthia
>><cynt6007 at vandals.uidaho.edu> wrote:
>>> Hi Hesham,
>>> Thanks for doing the stubs :)
>>> Could you pull all the implementation specific parts of mm.h and mm.inl into a header called mmimpl.h ?
>>> It would then match the header-style score is heading towards...
>>> If the no_memorymanagement.c is for devices without mm support, could you have the functions print out a "stub warning/error" message? That way the user knows not to rely on memory management...
>>I don't think we should have the stubs do anything in the normal case.
We should not add print statements to kernel code. Some users may
prefer to leave the stubs in place despite the lack of functionality.
Maybe you mean a compile-time warning, which would be fine to add.
>>We could add something when RTEMS_DEBUG is enabled.
More information about the devel