Tool chain for RTEMS 4.11

[Rempel, Cynthia]

>> Cindy (and others): A feature freeze is fine to talk about, but I
>> don't think we need an actual freeze. We can just cut a 4.11 branch
>> and treat it as a (pre)release branch with release branch rules---bug
>> fixes only. Then the git master branch can continue development under
>> the next version cycle.
>
>I am not so sure. We will never reach a point where a branch can be made
>unless as avoid commits that are not needed or not stable. If a commit
>enters the repo as a new feature, partially implemented or tested just
>before the branch then we could release something is not in a suitable
>state.
>
>Chris
Could we do the feature freeze from Mid-October to Mid-November (as that's when there's a high probability of a lull in development?)