testing new SMP scheduler

Gedare Bloom gedare at rtems.org
Thu Jun 13 21:53:20 UTC 2013

What do you mean? I would expect that selecting this scheduler when
SMP is not enabled will issue an error in confdefs.h, although I see
the current logic is to fall back to the default (priority) scheduler.

On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Joel Sherrill
<joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com> wrote:
> Hi
> Out of curiosity, did you hack confdefs.h to force this as the
> scheduler in uniprocessor configurations to ensure it does
> the correct things in that situation?
> --
> Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
> joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
> Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
> Support Available                (256) 722-9985
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-devel mailing list
> rtems-devel at rtems.org
> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel

More information about the devel mailing list