Gsoc2013-Atomic_Project-Status

[Gedare Bloom]

Can you simplify/shorten the testcases?

-G
On Jun 22, 2013 9:59 AM, "Deng Hengyi" <wei.a.yang at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> This is a brief status report about my GSOC2013 project ----- atomic ops
> support for RTEMS.
>
> DONE:
> 1. Setup the development environment including the latest rtems git repo,
> rtems-test git repo and qemu for realview_pbx_a9.
> 2. Build the latest rtems toolchains which include the stdatomic.h support.
> 3. Modify the existing atomic API to be compatible with C11 std atomic.h.
> 4. Replace the existing atomic SMP implementation with stdatomic.h.
> 5. Build the spatomic and smpatomic test case for realview_pbx_a9 SMP and
> UP.
> 6. All the spatomic and smpatomic have been passed.
> 7. Have submit the patches to devel list to be reviewed.
>
> TODO.
> 1. Plan to integrate the patches into mainline.
> 2. Support the stdatomic.h for other architectures such as PowerPC, Mips
> and Sparc.
> 3. Add the detection for whether support stdatomic.h for some
> architectures.
>
> WeiY
> Best Regards
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-devel mailing list
> rtems-devel at rtems.org
> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130622/ad8215e0/attachment.html>