RBTree status

[Wendell Silva]

Yes, indeed, Gedare,

It was very easy to port rbtree to 4.10: copy sources, adjustments in
Makefile.am, then regeneration of preinstall.am.
This a proof of good modularity of RTEMS :-)

Thanks.

--Wendell



2013/6/21 Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org>

> I would say it is quite mature by now. There were a number of
> improvements made when it was used for the "rbheap" memory management.
>
> I think it will be easy to merge into 4.10.
>
> -Gedare
>
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Wendell Silva <silvawp at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > What is the status of the RBTree implementation in RTEMS 4.10.99 (next
> > version)?
> >
> > I'm currently using RTEMS 4.10.2 and I'm planing to merge rbtree from
> > 4.10.99.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --Wendell.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtems-devel mailing list
> > rtems-devel at rtems.org
> > http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130624/4aef86bf/attachment-0001.html>