[PATCH] SMP06: add extra check to avoid silent error

[Daniel Hellstrom]

By adding an extra check which CPU the tasks are actually run at
and a printout if wrong we can avoid a silent error.
---
 testsuites/smptests/smp06/init.c |   14 ++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/testsuites/smptests/smp06/init.c b/testsuites/smptests/smp06/init.c
index ce0541e..ee9e519 100644
--- a/testsuites/smptests/smp06/init.c
+++ b/testsuites/smptests/smp06/init.c
@@ -16,8 +16,18 @@
 
 volatile bool Ran;
 
+#define INIT_TASK_IDX 0
+#define TA01_TASK_IDX 1
+#define TA02_TASK_IDX 2
+volatile uint32_t Ran_cpu[3];
+
 static void success(void)
 {
+  /* Check that TA2 replacced the oldest task - the Init task */
+  if ((Ran_cpu[INIT_TASK_IDX] != Ran_cpu[TA02_TASK_IDX]) ||
+      (Ran_cpu[TA01_TASK_IDX] == Ran_cpu[TA02_TASK_IDX])) {
+    locked_printf( "TA2 DID NOT REPLACE INIT TASK: TEST FAILED\n" );
+  }
   locked_printf( "*** END OF TEST SMP06 ***\n" );
   rtems_test_exit( 0 );
 }
@@ -39,8 +49,10 @@ rtems_task Test_task(
   Ran = true;
 
   if ( do_exit ) {
+    Ran_cpu[TA02_TASK_IDX] = cpu_num;
     success();
   }
+  Ran_cpu[TA01_TASK_IDX] = cpu_num;
   while(1)
     ;
 }
@@ -65,6 +77,8 @@ rtems_task Init(
   directive_failed( status, "clock tick" );
 
   cpu_num = rtems_smp_get_current_processor();
+  
+  Ran_cpu[INIT_TASK_IDX] = cpu_num;
 
   /*
    * Create a task at equal priority.
-- 
1.7.0.4