SMP Implementation Status

Joel Sherrill joel.sherrill at
Thu Apr 17 14:04:41 UTC 2014

On 4/16/2014 3:56 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Hello Jeff,
> I updated the status subsections in the implementation section.
Thanks but I am having trouble still trying to figure out what a short
summary should be. I would like the summary table to have phrases

+ complete
+ basic functionality complete with future enhancements identified
+ no work done
+ in process
+ partially complete

Picking on Low-level start
as an example, the Status is a description of the implementation. Beyond the
single phrase "is guided by" which implies it does it now and no Future
the description does not give one a hint as to what state this idea/task
is in.

My idea behind the summary table was to have a "red/green/yellow" view of
everything that was identified at a glance.

> On 2014-04-15 18:15, Jeff Mayes wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I’m trying to create a table on the RTEMS Wiki to monitor the SMP
>> implementation efforts.  See  For
>> anyone working in this area, would you please share the status of your efforts?
>>   Not looking for deep details, just high level comments about any ongoing and
>> future implementation.
>> Thanks
>> Jeff
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtems-devel mailing list
>> rtems-devel at

Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill at        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available                (256) 722-9985

More information about the devel mailing list