We should release 4.11

[Ben Gras]

All,

I'd love the Beagle BSP. I am fighting to find time to polish it, re-test
it, and re-submit the patches.

To decide whether that's feasible, is freezing the code for the release
'any day now' or more like 'any week now'?



On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com>
wrote:

>
> On 8/19/2014 4:34 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
> > On 20/08/2014 2:38 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> >> Anything holding it up at the moment?
> > It would be good to get a formal tool set definition into
> rtems-tools.git.
> >
> > I am currently testing a change to newlib 19-Aug-2014 which removes an
> > old patch we had.
> We need to make sure that we are on a path for the RSB, Debian and RPMs
> to come
> from the same tool versions and patches.
>
> Also there is likely a todo list for RTEMS itself. Not sure what that is
> off the top
> of my head but a few items:
>
> + Merge Beagle BSP
> + Merge pending GSOC work
> + 386 context switch SMP synchronization is not right. Others were updated.
>
> What's the status of the dynamic loader? I suspect it is on its own
> independent
> release arc.
>
>
> > Chris
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > devel at rtems.org
> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
> --
> Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
> joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
> Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
> Support Available                (256) 722-9985
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140820/b160997a/attachment-0002.html>