[PATCH 2/2] rtems: Add more clock tick functions

[Chris Johns]

On 24/08/2014 6:57 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 08/24/2014 05:02 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
>>
>> The calls names make sense from a programming point of view but from a
>> user point of view they are sort of forwards and backwards. For
>> example rtems_clock_ticks_later_us is the "the clock tick so many
>> micro-seconds later where later implies now" or
>> 'rtems_clock_tick_usecs_later' and following this I suppose
>> 'rtems_clock_ticks_later' becomes 'rtems_clock_tick_ticks_later' ?
>
> What about rtems_clock_tick_later() and rtems_clock_tick_before()? In
> the context it should be clear what they do, e.g.
>

Fine.

Chris