[PATCH 3/9] sb: Do not report current date

Sebastian Huber sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Tue Dec 9 07:00:53 UTC 2014


On 08/12/14 21:52, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 8/12/2014 5:48 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> This makes the report reproducible.
>
> I think the report should include a date. I do not see any advantage 
> having reproducible reports. The report captures the specific instance 
> of the build.

Yes, it captures a specific instance of the build, but why should the 
date be part of it?  What can you do with this date?

My goal is to get rid of anything that is host dependent, e.g. the home 
directory path.

If you really want the date, then I omit this patch.  For XML report 
however I would like to omit the date nonetheless.

> The purpose behind the report is to have an output from the process 
> that can feed into a QA audit type process. Part of the purpose of the 
> RTEMS tools is to create an RTEMS Ecosystem and this is about pushing 
> down into RTEMS report generation for these parts of process so users 
> can feed them up into their configuration management system.

My intention to use this report is to add it eventually to the RTEMS 
sources to that you can determine the tool chain that can build exactly 
this RTEMS version.  Since the RSB commit is included in the report, you 
can use the RSB in the best case to build the tools.  In the worst case 
the report should contain everything that is necessary to build it manually.

-- 
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.




More information about the devel mailing list