[PATCH] score: Delete _Thread_BSP_context

[Gedare Bloom]

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 4:35 AM, Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 2014-02-13 16:30, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>> I like the simplification. We should also clean up any BSPs that have
>> dead code beyond calling boot_card().
>
>
> Yes, but this has not a high priority.
>
>
>>
>> Does it make sense to add noreturn attributes to the initialization
>> call path starting with boot_card through
>> rtems_initialize_start_multitasking()?
>
>
> Its already there:
>
> http://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=48bff53b3dec885085b87db413329830110c9bb0
>
Ah, it is OK to only put it at the function declaration? Does it hurt
to replicate the noreturn statement in the function definition? I
think it can be more obvious to someone who reads the code.

> --
> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
>
> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
> Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
> Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
> E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> PGP     : Public key available on request.
>
> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.