Posix patchs to support affinity attribute in newlib

[Gedare Bloom]

On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 2014-03-03 16:36, Jennifer Averett wrote:
>>>
>>> >Is the implementation correct for CPU sets which are not pre-allocated?
>>> >
>>
>> Until we have a system that supports over 32 CPU's the implementation can
>> not be tested for this.  I minimized the locations that will have to be
>> touched
>> when we support this but I didn't think it was correct to add code that
>> can not
>> be tested.
>>
>
> You can test the inline functions separately.  You can add an _Assert() if
> someone hits a not implemented path.  If you copy an attribute with somehow
> allocated CPU sets, then you need to allocate somehow memory for the copy.
> This allocation may fail, so you cannot use a void function?
>
This is a good point. Most copy functions return the destination pointer.

>
> --
> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
>
> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
> Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
> Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
> E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> PGP     : Public key available on request.
>
> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
> _______________________________________________
> rtems-devel mailing list
> rtems-devel at rtems.org
> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel