RTEMS Chain API and SMP

[Chris Johns]

On 8/03/2014 3:45 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> This will make the protected Chain API stuck (for now, possibly
> forever) with coarse-grained locks,

Yeap.

> but users can define their own
> fine-grained locking implementations of chains using unprotected chain
> API calls?

Working is the first thing then working better can be done by users as 
they need based on their profiling.

> I think this is acceptable.

I agree.

Chris