[PATCH 2/2] Changed compiler optimization flag to optimize for size

[Peter Dufault]

Could this be conditional on BSP_SMALL_MEMORY?  Is that known in the Makefiles?

On Mar 19, 2014, at 11:48 , Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:

> Ok
> 
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:33 PM, James Fitzsimons
> <james.fitzsimons at gmail.com> wrote:
>> ---
>> c/src/lib/libbsp/m68k/mrm332/make/custom/mrm332.cfg | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/m68k/mrm332/make/custom/mrm332.cfg b/c/src/lib/libbsp/m68k/mrm332/make/custom/mrm332.cfg
>> index bf413b3..de07e73 100644
>> --- a/c/src/lib/libbsp/m68k/mrm332/make/custom/mrm332.cfg
>> +++ b/c/src/lib/libbsp/m68k/mrm332/make/custom/mrm332.cfg
>> @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ RTEMS_CPU_MODEL=mcpu32
>> #  and (hopefully) optimize for it.
>> CPU_CFLAGS = -mcpu=cpu32
>> 
>> -# optimize flag: typically -O2
>> -CFLAGS_OPTIMIZE_V = -O2 -g -fomit-frame-pointer
>> +# using optimise for size due to small memory on target board.
>> +CFLAGS_OPTIMIZE_V = -Os -g -fomit-frame-pointer
>> 
>> define bsp-post-link
>>        $(OBJCOPY) -O srec $(basename $@)$(EXEEXT) $(basename $@).srec
>> --
>> 1.8.3.2
>> 

Peter
-----------------
Peter Dufault
HD Associates, Inc.      Software and System Engineering