Coverity Issue with bdbuf.c

[Chris Johns]

On 20/11/2014 2:10 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On November 19, 2014 8:37:47 PM CST, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
>> I'm more concerned with the hard-coded cache alignment value, than I
>> am with the dead code.
>
> The code is likely not doing what the surge intended but Chris needs to comment on that bases on git blame. :)
>

Sebastian ? :)

> Definitely questionable having a hard coded value and then testing it.

Yes it should be fixed for 4.11.

Chris