[PATCH 50/52] cpukit/score/src/ts64*: Return a value from non-void function
Gedare Bloom
gedare at rtems.org
Wed Oct 8 20:22:27 UTC 2014
How did this stuff ever work, is it tested anywhere?
-Gedare
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com> wrote:
> ---
> cpukit/score/src/ts64equalto.c | 2 +-
> cpukit/score/src/ts64getnanoseconds.c | 2 +-
> cpukit/score/src/ts64getseconds.c | 2 +-
> cpukit/score/src/ts64lessthan.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/score/src/ts64equalto.c b/cpukit/score/src/ts64equalto.c
> index 28c6fa4..fd07474 100644
> --- a/cpukit/score/src/ts64equalto.c
> +++ b/cpukit/score/src/ts64equalto.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,6 @@ bool _Timestamp64_Equal_to(
> const Timestamp64_Control *_rhs
> )
> {
> - _Timestamp64_implementation_Equal_to( _lhs, _rhs );
> + return _Timestamp64_implementation_Equal_to( _lhs, _rhs );
> }
> #endif
> diff --git a/cpukit/score/src/ts64getnanoseconds.c b/cpukit/score/src/ts64getnanoseconds.c
> index 65a0b62..a5da43b 100644
> --- a/cpukit/score/src/ts64getnanoseconds.c
> +++ b/cpukit/score/src/ts64getnanoseconds.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,6 @@ uint32_t _Timestamp64_Get_nanoseconds(
> const Timestamp64_Control *_time
> )
> {
> - _Timestamp64_implementation_Get_nanoseconds( _time );
> + return _Timestamp64_implementation_Get_nanoseconds( _time );
> }
> #endif
> diff --git a/cpukit/score/src/ts64getseconds.c b/cpukit/score/src/ts64getseconds.c
> index 0f102bc..eca0536 100644
> --- a/cpukit/score/src/ts64getseconds.c
> +++ b/cpukit/score/src/ts64getseconds.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,6 @@ uint32_t _Timestamp64_Get_seconds(
> const Timestamp64_Control *_time
> )
> {
> - _Timestamp64_implementation_Get_seconds( _time );
> + return _Timestamp64_implementation_Get_seconds( _time );
> }
> #endif
> diff --git a/cpukit/score/src/ts64lessthan.c b/cpukit/score/src/ts64lessthan.c
> index 5c518c0..d147814 100644
> --- a/cpukit/score/src/ts64lessthan.c
> +++ b/cpukit/score/src/ts64lessthan.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,6 @@ bool _Timestamp64_Less_than(
> const Timestamp64_Control *_rhs
> )
> {
> - _Timestamp64_implementation_Less_than( _lhs, _rhs );
> + return _Timestamp64_implementation_Less_than( _lhs, _rhs );
> }
> #endif
> --
> 1.9.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
More information about the devel
mailing list