Batch of Patches from Joel

[Joel Sherrill]

On 10/14/2014 3:30 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On 10/14/2014 3:28 PM, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 14/10/2014 11:24 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>> On October 14, 2014 1:29:50 AM CDT, Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>>>> On 13/10/14 17:48, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>>> On 10/13/2014 10:43 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/13/2014 05:18 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>>>>>> NOTE: For defaults for weak symbols, I am just adding
>>>>>>> a prototype to the C file.
>>>>>> How do you then ensure that a non-weak implementation has the same
>>>>>> signature?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Don't ask me. I didn't add any of these weak symbol options to any
>>>> BSP.
>>>>> I am only fixing warnings on existing code. :)
>>>> Adding a prototype for a global function to the C file doesn't fix the
>>>> warning.
>>>>   It just silences the warning and obscures things.
>>> Every case I have seen so far is for bsp_start() to have a weak default version. There is a prototype for that in BSP/bootcard.h and the default version can be static.
>>>
>>> I have started making the week default static. I will sweep to ensure they all are but if someone beats me to it, I won't complain.
>>>
>> Weak and static ? If so it does not make any sense to me.
> The public "proper" name has to be not-static but the default can be
> static.

I think this indicates it works.

https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-12/msg00009.html
>> Chris

-- 
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available                (256) 722-9985