BSPs which define NDEBUG in CFLAGS

[Federico Casares]

OK, perfect.

Thanks


On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On September 3, 2014 6:41:45 AM CDT, Federico Casares <
> federico.casares at tallertechnologies.com> wrote:
> >Hi Joel,
> >
> >We did the lpc1768* BSPs. If we remove the NDEBUG... which will be the
> >procedure to disable ASSERTS for production builds?
>
> Ultimately you (end user) select the flags you want to deploy with. :)
>
> My goal is just ensure builds work with and without it defined.
>
> >regards.
> >
> >
> >
> >On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Joel Sherrill
> ><joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com> wrote:
> >
> >Hi
> >
> >The following BSPs define NDEBUG in their CFLAGS and thus fail
> >to compile when RTEMS debug is enabled:
> >
> >mvme136
> >lpc1768_mbed_ahb_ram
> >lpc1768_mbed
> >rtl22xx
> >
> >I have tracked this down to newlib's assert.h (correctly) not
> >defining __ASSERT_FUNC when NDEBUG is defined.  This trips
> >up the RTEMS assert definitions which rely on that definition
> >of __ASSERT_FUNC.
> >
> >I can fix this by using the logic in newlib's assert.h to define
> >__RTEMS_ASSERT_FUNC for our own assert's use.
> >
> >Any objections to this approach?
> >
> >--
> >Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
> >joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
> >Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
> >Support Available                (256) 722-9985
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >devel mailing list
> >devel at rtems.org
> >http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >
> >
> >Casares, Federico
> >
> >Sr. Software Engineer
> >
> >Taller Technologies Argentina
> >
> >San Lorenzo 47, 3rd Floor, Office 5
> >Córdoba, Argentina
>
>


-- 
[image: http://www.tallertechnologies.com]
<http://www.tallertechnologies.com>
Casares, Federico
Sr. Software Engineer
Taller Technologies Argentina

San Lorenzo 47, 3rd Floor, Office 5
Córdoba, Argentina
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140903/81b17893/attachment-0002.html>