[PATCH] Fix missing include for PTHREAD_MINIMUM_STACK_SIZE

[Joel Sherrill]

On August 2, 2015 12:35:29 PM CDT, Jan Sommer <soja-lists at aries.uberspace.de> wrote:
>Am Sonntag, 2. August 2015, 10:34:05 schrieb Joel Sherrill:
>> Top posting.. ada-tests now build on at least 4.11. I committed
>> the same patch to the master so they should build there. I
>> didn't run any.
>> 
>
>Quick question: How do I build the tests?
>The configure output says "--enable-tests          enable tests
>(default:samples)"
>And looking at enable-tests.m4 it seems other options are yes and no,
>so the ada-tests will build if I set it to "yes"?
>Are they part of "make all", because I remember in the beginning I
>couldn't find the built samples.

--enable-adaexp with --enable-tests I think is the combination.


I need to look at the gnat source to see why it is off by one for RTEMS.

>
>> --joel
>> 
>> On 08/02/2015 10:20 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> > On 08/01/2015 12:48 PM, Jan Sommer wrote:
>> >> Am Samstag, 1. August 2015, 12:31:53 schrieb Joel Sherrill:
>> >>> On 08/01/2015 12:24 PM, Jan Sommer wrote:
>> >>>> Yes, I needed to add it to make the ada-examples compile.
>> >>>>
>> >>> Did it need to be included anywhere other than libgnat/adasupp.c?
>> >>>
>> >> Well, so far I haven't encountered the problem somewhere else, but
>have been working with the Ada-examples mainly atm.
>> >>
>> >>> Sebastian reworked public vs private .h files and more includes
>moved
>> >>> to .c files. Since everything but Ada specific support files
>compile
>> >>> on every target, I am prone to want to fix the file that needs
>this.
>> >>>
>> >> I see. I just saw that pthreadimpl.h defines a call to a function
>it does not include and thought it might be slipped at some point
>because it's not used often.
>> >> I don't mind keeping it local. My goal is to spend less time with
>the examples in the future anyway ;-)
>> >>
>> > I did a test build of 4.11 and master this morning. No patch was
>> > needed to built libgnat.
>> >
>> > But the Ada tests have an init.c which needs some love. Did you
>> > attempt to build the Ada tests? Just curious before I dive too far
>> > into fixing ada-tests/support/init.c.
>> >>> I would check for my patches but I appear to have deleted my
>RTEMS
>> >>> clone since then and lost the small patch I had. :(
>> >>>
>> >>> --joel
>> >>>> Am Samstag, 1. August 2015, 12:08:12 schrieb Joel Sherrill:
>> >>>>> Can you give a configuration or file that broke with this?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I recall that I had a local patch that just added this line to
>an Ada specific C file. Nothing else broke.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On August 1, 2015 5:51:31 AM CDT, Jan
>Sommer<soja-lists at aries.uberspace.de>    wrote:
>> >>>>>> ---
>> >>>>>> cpukit/posix/include/rtems/posix/pthreadimpl.h | 1 +
>> >>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> diff --git a/cpukit/posix/include/rtems/posix/pthreadimpl.h
>> >>>>>> b/cpukit/posix/include/rtems/posix/pthreadimpl.h
>> >>>>>> index f95ac9c..33fa33d 100644
>> >>>>>> --- a/cpukit/posix/include/rtems/posix/pthreadimpl.h
>> >>>>>> +++ b/cpukit/posix/include/rtems/posix/pthreadimpl.h
>> >>>>>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>> >>>>>> #include<rtems/posix/threadsup.h>
>> >>>>>> #include<rtems/score/objectimpl.h>
>> >>>>>> #include<rtems/score/threadimpl.h>
>> >>>>>> +#include<rtems/score/stackimpl.h>
>> >>>>>> #include<rtems/score/assert.h>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> #ifdef __cplusplus
>> >>>>> --joel
>> >>>
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> 

--joel