Uniprocessor implementation of nested mutex problem of priority inversion.

[Saurabh Gadia]

Ok. I will mail you back soon.

On Thursday, August 13, 2015, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:

> Saurabh,
>
> Please pull from rtems.git again, create a new branch from 'master',
> and apply your changes to the branch. It's too hard to review code
> that is not all by itself on a branch.
>
> Gedare
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:28 AM, Saurabh Gadia <gadia at usc.edu
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have implemented uniprocessor model of nested mutex problem in rtems.
> its
> > still in basic form. I tried to multiplex it with the existing solution
> but
> > was finding hard time. To push ahead, I decided to have separate
> functions
> > for uniprocessor and SMP(kept default behavior) and with your review
> > comments will know what to do. Following is the link for the git repo:
> > https://github.com/saurabhgadia4/rtems/commits/master and its JPF
> branch:
> >
> https://github.com/saurabhgadia4/lock-model/blob/uniproc-new1/rtems/Mutex.java
> >
> > I have also tested spsem01, 02, 03 test cases. Following are the links
> for
> > the test case results which states output before solution and after
> applying
> > the solution. I am still not getting whether my code is passing spsem03
> test
> > or not. How can I verify that?
> >
> > Test Case Link:
> >
> https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B44HRKVuGCkFfnFDVmxqQzZZUzljNUg4YmVPZmEybEp2Q0NNclpvS2FvemZ4Tm5Xa19nemM&usp=sharing
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Saurabh Gadia
>


-- 
Thanks,

Saurabh Gadia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150813/5bb7a1d5/attachment-0002.html>