Ticker interrupt priority

[Martin Galvan]

On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Martin Galvan
<martin.galvan at tallertechnologies.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
>> A couple of odd guesses. If there are non-RTEMS interrupts, they must
>> be the highest priority.
>
> Precisely, I'd like to know why the ticker interrupt must always have
> a lower priority.

Particularly, we'd like to know what would happen if we set the ticker
interrupt priority to the same as the rest.