C++0x/1y concurrency support status

[Joel Sherrill]

On 3/2/2015 10:19 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I had only a brief view at the new features. Most stuff will probably 
> work with a moderate amount of work. In case you are interested in 
> specific features, then it would be nice to add some test cases to the 
> test suite, so that we know that it works or what to do.
>
> On 02/03/15 17:14, Daniel Gutson wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>     I know this has been asked before.
>>
>> What's the status of the new C++ threading model implementation? I
>> barely recall people saying that
>> there were some features provided in the GNU's STL that uses POSIX
>> features not currently
>> implemented in RTEMS.
I don't recall that as much as I recall concerns over the code not
checking return statuses.

I think we are only missing a couple of pthread calls added in
POSIX 2008. There may be a feature missing like an odd clock.
But I don't think missing was the issue.

>> We are interested in the C++0x/1y concurrency features for some
>> non-real time software modules,
>> so if somebody could save us some research time, would be very helpful
>> to complete the implementation if needed.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>      Daniel.
>>
>

-- 
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available                (256) 722-9985