New source layout.
Amar Takhar
amar at rtems.org
Thu Mar 12 13:51:58 UTC 2015
On 2015-03-12 09:45 -0400, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> This doesn't work in supposedly CPU-independent source code files.
>
> Let's take percpu.h as an example. We need to include it in
> <rtems/score/thread.h> -- the main header for thread scheduling that
> is included by virtually every source file in the supercore. We can't
> include the CPU-dependent headers here, unless we use the CPP #if-elif
> cascase as mentioned by Sebastian.
The eventual goal is everything would be distilled to a single header per arch
that would have to be included in your application source. Right now that is
not possible and we do use the if-elif solution right now in the waf build as a
stopgap.
I've asked Chris to better explain this he understands the issues from an RTEMS
perspective better than I do. He also knows what the eventual goal of the
header move is.
To be clear: the intermediary period is already solved in the waf build nothing
will have to change. As we change / 'unwind' the headers we'll modify the
source. This is going to be a drawn out process. The nice thing is any changes
we make in this regard is verifiable by using hashes of the resulting objects.
Amar.
More information about the devel
mailing list