[PATCH 34/45] score: Do not inline SMP lock if profiling enabled

[Gedare Bloom]

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 3:36 AM, Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 17/05/15 04:21, Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>> Not really related, but what is the "rule" for when we should use
>> RTEMS_INLINE_ROUTINE versus being able to say "static inline"?
>
>
> This file already used "static inline" and this is fine, since it requires
> at least C11 or C++11.
>
> We should eliminate RTEMS_INLINE_ROUTINE and maybe define inline to
> __inline__ if desired in basedefs.h.
>
OK this propoasl can go to a ticket for further discussion.

> --
> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
>
> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
> Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
> Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
> E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> PGP     : Public key available on request.
>
> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
>