[PATCH] Export _NCPUWORDS as variable for access from within the gnat-rts
Joel Sherrill
joel at rtems.org
Thu Oct 29 15:24:12 UTC 2015
On 10/29/2015 9:20 AM, Jan Sommer wrote:
> Am Thursday 29 October 2015, 08:45:57 schrieb Joel Sherrill:
>>
>> On 10/29/2015 8:14 AM, Jan Sommer wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This patch will make the define _NCPUWORDS accessible for the ada runtime. It is necessary to model the pthread_attr_t implementation for rtems in Ada.
>>> We had a stack corruption because the C an Ada declarations of the type where out of synch.
>>> I will send the updated s-osinte-rtems.ads to gcc if this patch is accepted.
>>>
>>> I put devel at rtems.org CC for input from the rtems developers.
>>>
>>
>> Is it possible to define this in the RTEMS Ada glue file?
>>
>
> What is the rtems Ada glue file?
There are two support files in cpukit/libgnat. I looked through
the git log history of these files and it is quite boring. But
there isn't much code here, it is target independent, and might
be worth a double check. Better that than debugging something
else.
There is also some BSP specific code to map exceptions into
Ada exceptions. Some is in libbsp/shared. From memory, the sparc
BSPs have the exception propagation glue.
> Just to clarify: The problem I had was that pthread_attr_t has a field of
>
> typedef struct _cpuset {
> cpu_set_word_t __bits[_NCPUWORDS];
> } cpu_set_t;
>
> which's length depends on _NCPUWORDS.
> In ada I added types like this:
>
> NUMCPUWORDS : constant size_t;
>
> pragma Import (
> Convention => C,
> Entity => NUMCPUWORDS,
> External_Name => "_ADA_NCPUWORDS"
> );
>
> type cpu_set_array is array (0 .. NUMCPUWORDS) of
> aliased cpu_set_word_t;
>
> type cpu_set_t is record
> bits : aliased cpu_set_array;
> end record;
>
> I just put it into newlib, because I thought the export should be close to the original declaration.
> If you can point to a better fitting location I am happy to put it there.
There are a handful of similar cases handled in libgnat.
You have to have real C variables or methods to use
macros.
> Best regards,
>
> Jan
>
>> Generally, I like the Ada support to be self-contained and
>> have no impact on anything else. This puts an Ada specific
>> variable in generic code.
>>
>> This is similar to how I had to do the Ada task minimum
>> stack size. It could have gone in more common code but
>> nothing else uses it so should not be impacted.
>>
>> Plus newlib doesn't know anything about our Ada glue layer.
>> Best to keep it that way.
>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Jan
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.
Check out RTEMS at https://www.rtems.org
Truly free real-time operating sysem
More information about the devel
mailing list