[PATCH 00/13] Replace mongoose with civetweb.

[Joel Sherrill]

I am really with Gedare and Chris that it would be better to treat this as
an upstream project. Use the RSB and track patches through RTEMS tools.

It would be a good case to push the model of a single network service
supporting both stacks and begin the process of removing networking code
from the base RTEMS git repo.

It would also push us to figure out how to rest RSB built packages.
On Apr 22, 2016 12:05 AM, "Christian Mauderer" <
christian.mauderer at embedded-brains.de> wrote:

> Yes that's right. 05/13 just adds the unchanged sources from civetweb.
> Beneath civetweb.c and civetweb.h it also adds handle_form.inl and
> md5.inl. The last two files are included into civetweb.c. According to
> the documentation "The *INL* file extension represents code that is
> statically included inline in a source file."
>
> And yes: The patch didn't get through. I have got a replay that "Your
> message to devel awaits moderator approval". The civetweb.c file is over
> 300k and the mailing list seems to have a maximum of 256k. I hoped that
> one of the mail admins would approve the patch soon.
>
> Am 21.04.2016 um 22:49 schrieb Gedare Bloom:
> > I think patch 05/13 probably adds civetweb.c and civetweb.h? But it
> > did not come through the mailman.
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
> >> P.S. might be worth it to open a ticket related to civetweb and
> >> #update it from these patches.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
> >>> Is the plan eventually to be able to use the upstream civetweb? or to
> >>> track it with our own copy?
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:49 AM, Christian Mauderer
> >>> <christian.mauderer at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> >>>> This patch series replaces the mongoose webserver by its still MIT
> >>>> licensed fork civetweb.
> >>>>
> >>>> Please note that I try to get some (currently two) of the patches
> >>>> directly into civetweb too. But I think that it might need some time
> and
> >>>> adaption till they are accepted. So I thought that adding them to
> RTEMS
> >>>> would still make sense as a working interim solution.
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> devel mailing list
> >>>> devel at rtems.org
> >>>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------
> embedded brains GmbH
> Christian Mauderer
> Dornierstr. 4
> D-82178 Puchheim
> Germany
> email: christian.mauderer at embedded-brains.de
> Phone: +49-89-18 94 741 - 18
> Fax:   +49-89-18 94 741 - 08
> PGP: Public key available on request.
>
> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20160423/27ff05e7/attachment.html>