Planned SMP Improvements
Gedare Bloom
gedare at rtems.org
Mon Feb 1 15:57:25 UTC 2016
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Darshit Shah <darnir at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 27 January 2016 at 10:54, Sebastian Huber
> <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>> Maybe we can implement
>>
>> Improve the SMP scheduler with arbitrary processor affinity support
>> https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2510
>>
>> as part of this years GSoC.
>>
> I've already mentioned that I'd be interested in picking this up as a
> potential project. However, the entire implementation may not be
> possible in a single summer. It is rather complex, and while a naive
> implementation may be possible to write, we would want something more
> efficient. I'm hoping for some pointers on where I should start
> looking for a better understanding of the codebase.
>
Your best bet is probably to look at some of the smptests and follow
the logic there. The primary documentation for the kernel is in
doxygen currently:
https://docs.rtems.org/doxygen/cpukit/html/modules.html
You should start to break-down the larger project into smaller
sub-projects/tasks and think about your project plan. This will help
you to write a strong proposal that could guide you through the entire
summer.
Also, getting one of the SMP-capable targets running is a good idea.
Last I remember there is an ARM target you can run in SMP mode on
Qemu.
Gedare
More information about the devel
mailing list