Which I2c framework to prefer for BSP

[Sebastian Huber]

Hello,

please use the cpukit/dev/i2c framework. For example bus drivers see

https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/xilinx-zynq/i2c/cadence-i2c.c
https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/atsam/i2c/atsam_i2c_bus.c

On 13/07/16 19:21, punit vara wrote:
> Hi all !
>
> I have just started reading about I2C from TRM to achieve my next
> deliverable . As Gedare told there are two I2C frame work in RTEMS.
> Which one I should use during implementation cpukit/libi2c or
> cpukit/dev/i2c ? I would like to confirm before start coding.
>
> Regards,
> Punit Vara
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

-- 
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.