Porting Rock on RTEMS as GSoC project

Tue Mar 15 02:42:45 UTC 2016

Hi,
I have followed the instructions on the
https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Simulators/QEMU#Usingthertems-testingModule

But each time I run the pc386 simscript, I get the message on the console

tcg doesn't support requested feature:cpuid.01h.edx.vme[bit 1]

and then nothing happens, I do not get any output.

Can someone resolve this error?

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:

> The quickest way to get started is to follow the directions at
>
> https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Simulators/QEMU#Usingthertems-testingModule
>
> you can use the rtems-source-builder/bare/devel/qemu.bset to compile qemu.
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Sambeet Panigrahi
> <sambeet161616 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thank you. I would still like to continue with my work with Rock because
> I
> > like it and the experience would help.
> > So I did not get your previous answer.How am I supposed to run the build
> > conf?Qemu is an emulator so I can run it on my system and then emulate
> > i386-rtems/pc486 BSP and then try running Rock on it.
> >
> > https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Simulators/QEMU
> >
> > Can you be a little more elaborate please?
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Sambeet Panigrahi
> > <sambeet161616 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> This is not an open project. But Joel has suggested for a ROS port.Will
> >> that
> >> be a feasible project for GSoC-2016? Is RTEMS community interested for a
> >> ROS
> >> port if I can find co-mentors?
> >>
> >> On Mar 3, 2016 11:17 PM, "Gedare Bloom" <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The IoT project is interesting, but it needs some additional fleshing
> >>> out. I tend to agree with Sebastian's interpretation of the lack of
> >>> interest from the Rock community will make it hard to complete a GSoC
> >>> successfully.
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Sambeet Panigrahi
> >>> <sambeet161616 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > Hi,
> >>> > I have had the opportunity of talking to Sebastian Huber. He does not
> >>> > consider the porting of Rock on RTEMS as a suitable GSoC project.In
> his
> >>> > words
> >>> >
> >>> > "since the rock project seems to have no interest in RTEMS support I
> >>> > don't
> >>> > think this is a suitable GSoC project"
> >>> >
> >>> > I have made some progress in understanding CMake and rock libraries
> for
> >>> > the
> >>> > purpose of the port. But the fact is the replies have been really
> late.
> >>> > It
> >>> > is true to some extent. Should I reconsider the project?
> >>> > If so, my next choice after Tiny RTEMS is the IOT project. How far do
> >>> > you
> >>> > think that is feasible?
> >>> > Regards
> >>> > Sambeet
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> There is no official work. If he has been answering questions, that
> is
> >>> >> good. You should work on creating a suitably complete proposal, and
> >>> >> you should attempt to recreate the prior work as well as you can. We
> >>> >> do not want you spending the first chunk of summer just getting to
> the
> >>> >> point that previous attempts got already.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Gedare
> >>> >>
> >>> >> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Sambeet Panigrahi
> >>> >> <sambeet161616 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> > Hi,
> >>> >> > I have talked with previous socis students and people from
> dfki.They
> >>> >> > are
> >>> >> > all
> >>> >> > ready to answer questions, but not hold any official position.  I
> >>> >> > have
> >>> >> > contacted Martin Zenzes of dfki and he has been very helpful in
> >>> >> > helping
> >>> >> > me
> >>> >> > to understand the project and I quote from his mail:
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > "and lets say you can ask me anything, but i'm hesitant to fill
> >>> >> > official
> >>> >> > positions?"
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > So will it solve the purpose.Does he need to apply for
> co-mentoring
> >>> >> > with
> >>> >> > google or is there some official work involved?
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Rock co-mentor is not mandatory, but highly encouraged and will
> >>> >> > improve your project's chances to be accepted and to be
> successful.
> >>> >> > You should reach out to the SOCIS student and mentors to see if
> they
> >>> >> > would be willing to co-mentor for GSoC.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > TinyRTEMS is not a great project currently as there are many
> efforts
> >>> >> > ongoing that make this a moving target. The most likely work to be
> >>> >> > done is to fix the remaining linkcmds files (ld linker scripts) to
> >>> >> > add
> >>> >> > the right KEEP() directives so that our gcc per-function and
> >>> >> > per-section optimizations work correctly. I don't see this as
> >>> >> > sufficient for GSoC currently.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > Gedare
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 1:38 AM, Sambeet Panigrahi
> >>> >> > <sambeet161616 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >> I have been trying to reach potential co-mentors from the Rock
> >>> >> >> community.However the response has not been that good. Is
> >>> >> >> co-mentoring
> >>> >> >> a
> >>> >> >> compulsory condition? I also wanted to know if Tiny RTEMS project
> >>> >> >> can
> >>> >> >> be
> >>> >> >> taken up as a GSoCproject this year.
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org>
> >>> >> >> wrote:
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>> You should try to get someone from the Rock or the Orocos
> >>> >> >>> community
> >>> >> >>> to
> >>> >> >>> commit to (co-)mentor you if at all possible.
> >>> >> >>>
> >>> >> >>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Sambeet Panigrahi
> >>> >> >>> <sambeet161616 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> >>> > Hi,
> >>> >> >>> > I am interested in working on porting Rock on RTEMS. I am
> >>> >> >>> > currently
> >>> >> >>> > working
> >>> >> >>> > on replicating Matthias Goldhoorn's work. I am also trying to
> go
> >>> >> >>> > through
> >>> >> >>> > previous projects taken by Anna Vasquez for SOCIS. I wanted to
> >>> >> >>> > know
> >>> >> >>> > if
> >>> >> >>> > this
> >>> >> >>> > can be taken up as a project this year?
> >>> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> > Regards
> >>> >> >>> > Sambeet
> >>> >> >>> >
> >>> >> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >>> >> >>> > devel mailing list
> >>> >> >>> > devel at rtems.org
> >>> >> >>> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >
> >>> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20160315/9e2a5608/attachment.html>