Prototype warning for clock_nanosleep()

[Joel Sherrill]

On Nov 9, 2016 2:05 PM, "Gedare Bloom" <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
>
> This is/should be based on the definition of _POSIX_CLOCK_SELECTION
> and we get this from newlib/libc/include/sys/features.h as of commit
> 9a80679aae9098aa189f7ea8ce7892e2c092f3be in newlib.git. If there is a
> warning, then probably rsb is not getting a new enough newlib for it.

Yep. Saw that and thought a POSIX_C_SOURCE define would trip it but it
didn't.

We are at newlib-2.4.0.20160527-1. There is a 20160923.

Do we need to upgrade newlib?

And .. did we get resolution on my patch to upgrade binutils?

--joel


> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > In a build sweep, I noticed that every use of clock_nanosleep()
> > has a warning for it not being defined. I don't seem to be able
> > to find the magic to turn on the prototype in time.h. Does
> > anyone see what needs to be done?
> >
> > ==================
> > #define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 200112L
> >
> > #include <time.h>
> >
> > void f(void)
> > {
> >   int rc;
> >
> >   rc = clock_nanosleep();
> > }
> > ==================
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --joel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > devel at rtems.org
> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20161109/e428842c/attachment.html>