Prototype warning for clock_nanosleep()

[Joel Sherrill]

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
> > On Nov 9, 2016 2:05 PM, "Gedare Bloom" <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> This is/should be based on the definition of _POSIX_CLOCK_SELECTION
> >> and we get this from newlib/libc/include/sys/features.h as of commit
> >> 9a80679aae9098aa189f7ea8ce7892e2c092f3be in newlib.git. If there is a
> >> warning, then probably rsb is not getting a new enough newlib for it.
> >
> > Yep. Saw that and thought a POSIX_C_SOURCE define would trip it but it
> > didn't.
> >
> > We are at newlib-2.4.0.20160527-1. There is a 20160923.
> >
> > Do we need to upgrade newlib?
> >
> Yes.
>
>
 And I just had to report to newlib a build error. Hopefully we
can get a newer snapshot that builds. :(

> And .. did we get resolution on my patch to upgrade binutils?
> >
>
> Chris asked for testing, and Sebastian said to just make sure it
> builds on all targets.
>
>
OK. I will push it in a little while. I have been using it for a couple
of months and just forgot to submit it.

--joel


> > --joel
> >
> >
> >> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
> >> > Hi
> >> >
> >> > In a build sweep, I noticed that every use of clock_nanosleep()
> >> > has a warning for it not being defined. I don't seem to be able
> >> > to find the magic to turn on the prototype in time.h. Does
> >> > anyone see what needs to be done?
> >> >
> >> > ==================
> >> > #define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 200112L
> >> >
> >> > #include <time.h>
> >> >
> >> > void f(void)
> >> > {
> >> >   int rc;
> >> >
> >> >   rc = clock_nanosleep();
> >> > }
> >> > ==================
> >> >
> >> > Thanks.
> >> >
> >> > --joel
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > devel mailing list
> >> > devel at rtems.org
> >> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20161109/ca361ba5/attachment-0002.html>