[PATCH] c-user: Add self-contained objects chapter
Cudmore, Alan P. (GSFC-5820)
alan.p.cudmore at nasa.gov
Thu Dec 21 15:48:44 UTC 2017
I like the idea of higher performance locking and the reduced need for error checking. We have had internal debates on how much error checking needs to be done when locking and unlocking a mutex for a shared data structure.
Are these new APIs in addition to the classic RTEMS APIs for similar objects?
Since there are performance benefits, is there any reason to use the classic API over the self-contained objects?
Finally, the ticket referenced in some of the patches (2843) has a milestone of 6.1. Are the self-contained objects going in 5.1?
Thanks!
Alan
On 12/21/17, 9:19 AM, "devel on behalf of Sebastian Huber" <devel-bounces at rtems.org on behalf of sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
Attached is the generated chapter with references.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
More information about the devel
mailing list