qemu RSB bset with gcc 6.3.0

[Joel Sherrill]

Hi again,

I am taking a shot at fixing this and fetching the patches from the
Freedesktop
ticket.

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95326

When I use wget to fetch the patch link, the file names are of the form:

gdate.c?id=0817af40e8c74c721c30f6ef482b1f53d12044c7
52ecda6335add96494a178186bf7d490

And the RSB is fetching both as "gdate.c"

How do I fetch these patches and specify the md5 sum?

%patch add glib
https://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/patch/glib/gdate.c?id=0817af40e8c74c721c30f6ef482b1f53d12044c7
%hash md5 gdate.c?id=0817af40e8c74c721c30f6ef482b1f53d12044c7
52ecda6335add96494a178186bf7d490

%patch add glib
https://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/patch/glib/gdate.c?id=8cdbc7fb2c8c876902e457abe46ee18a0b134486
%hash md5 gdate.c?id=8cdbc7fb2c8c876902e457abe46ee18a0b134486
16bc0b96bbfa7c2b350df6f4aff2db29

Thanks.

--joel


On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:10 AM, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Feb 14, 2017 8:47 PM, "Chris Johns" <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
>
> On 15/02/2017 04:00, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Helping someone using Debian unstable which uses gcc 6.3.0. glib has
>> code using strftime() which is now flagged and glib is compiled with
>> -Werror.
>>
>> gdate.c:2497 in glib 2.39. On the glib master at github, it is line 2500
>> and
>> the code is fixed with a blame/comment in 2002.
>>
>> My first thought was to bump the glib version but glib is at 2.50 and
>> I am concerned about interface changes. Besides, this isn't fixed
>> on their master from what we saw.
>>
>> Someone reported this to Freedesktop with this issue:
>>
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95326
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>>
> I have some patches sitting around somewhere to bump a few bits and pieces
> used to build qemu when I tried to build qemu on OSX. I could not get it to
> build and I did not have the time to complete the work.
>
>
> I filed a ticket and think I have the solution based on that ticket. Just
> need to spend the time updating the package.
>
> I don't see any reason to investigate rebaselining qemu yet.
>
>
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20170215/7332ae18/attachment-0002.html>