psxshm01 and psxshm02 fail on SPARC/erc32

[Chris Johns]

> On 26 Jan 2017, at 9:13 am, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2017 5:04 PM, "Chris Johns" <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
> 
> Why not tag the test as "excepted fail" in the .tcfg file for all archs? All testing frame works need to be updated to handle the new message at the start of the test and either report the excepted fail did fail or it passed, requiring we update the .tcfg file.
> 
> Is this a failure on a single BSP or all? I got the impression it was currently failing on all and was expected to until Gedare got the backends working for our use cases.

Yes, all. 

> How so we deal with this?

Maybe I add an "all" and "arch" tcfg file to the top level that is loaded?

Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20170127/5ccfaba3/attachment-0002.html>