Coverage analysis update

[Cillian O'Donnell]

On 7 July 2017 at 02:39, Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
> On 07/07/2017 00:34, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Cillian O'Donnell <cpodonnell8 at gmail.com
>> <mailto:cpodonnell8 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>     >> When a test run is successful it will also finish with a lot of these messages:
>>     Also I wanted to mention, there is quite a bit of work from the 2
>>     previous students on the integration of the coverage work into RTEMS
>>     Tester, would you be interested in starting the merging process of
>>     this. It might take a while to get everything reviewed and make any
>>     necessary changes. At this point it is working. its just fixing bugs,
>>     which I'm working on at the moment.
>>
>> Chris.. I suggested this. It seems the basic flow and integration of
>> coverage into the tester is good enough to review and merge.
>>
>
> Is there a place where this work is merged into something that can be reviewed?

I just rebased against master and the work can be found under the
coverage-review branch here if you want to take a look:

https://github.com/cillianodonnell/rtems-tools/tree/coverage-review

Thanks,

Cillian.
>
> Is there an explanation of the procedure being implemented? The last I could
> find is https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2014-May/006692.html, search for
> "The procedure is as follows ...".
>
> For merging I am interested in the merging of what may be happening externally
> in scripts to use the functionality provided in the RTEMS Toolkit, for example
> symbols.
>
> Chris