RISC-V/HiFive memory limitations

Hesham Almatary heshamelmatary at gmail.com
Mon Jun 19 20:57:43 UTC 2017


Hi Denis,

If you cscope this symbol you'll end up with the following:

/**
>  * By default, use the minimum stack size requested by this port.
>  */
> #ifndef CONFIGURE_MINIMUM_TASK_STACK_SIZE
>   #define CONFIGURE_MINIMUM_TASK_STACK_SIZE CPU_STACK_MINIMUM_SIZE
> #endif
>

This means if you, from the application (i.e. hello or ticker), didn't
define CONFIGURE_MINIMUM_TASK_STACK_SIZE it will be CPU_STACK_MINIMUM_SIZE
which is 4KiB for riscv32 CPU
(cpukit/score/cpu/riscv32/rtems/score/cpu.h:457)


On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Denis Obrezkov <denisobrezkov at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hesham, could you check what is the value of rtems_minimum_stack_size in
> your SPIKE executable?
>
> 2017-06-18 22:10 GMT+03:00 Denis Obrezkov <denisobrezkov at gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I was able to proceed further via setting rtems_minimum_stack_size
>> manually to 0x200.
>> Now I have another error, my backtrace:
>> #0  0x20403728 in _Internal_error
>> (core_error=INTERNAL_ERROR_WORKSPACE_ALLOCATION)
>>     at
>>
/home/reprofy/Projects/riscv/rtems/development/rtems/kernel/rtems-riscv/c/src/../../cpukit/score/src/interr.c:44
>> #1  0x2040ec40 in _Workspace_Allocate_or_fatal_error (size=2976696) at
>>
/home/reprofy/Projects/riscv/rtems/development/rtems/kernel/rtems-riscv/c/src/../../cpukit/score/src/wkspace.c:163
>> #2  0x2040f0e6 in _Freechain_Initialize (freechain=0x80000c3c
>> <_RTEMS_tasks_Information+60>, allocator=0x2040ec16
>> <_Workspace_Allocate_or_fatal_error>, number_nodes=41343, node_size=72)
>>     at
>>
/home/reprofy/Projects/riscv/rtems/development/rtems/kernel/rtems-riscv/c/src/../../cpukit/score/src/freechain.c:31
>> #3  0x20409346 in _Thread_Initialize_information (information=0x80000c00
>> <_RTEMS_tasks_Information>, the_api=OBJECTS_CLASSIC_API, the_class=1,
>> maximum=3908149631, is_string=false,
>>     maximum_name_length=4) at
>>
/home/reprofy/Projects/riscv/rtems/development/rtems/kernel/rtems-riscv/c/src/../../cpukit/score/src/thread.c:68
>> #4  0x20401dac in _RTEMS_tasks_Manager_initialization () at
>>
/home/reprofy/Projects/riscv/rtems/development/rtems/kernel/rtems-riscv/c/src/../../cpukit/rtems/src/tasks.c:72
>> #5  0x204021bc in rtems_initialize_executive () at
>>
/home/reprofy/Projects/riscv/rtems/development/rtems/kernel/rtems-riscv/c/src/../../cpukit/sapi/src/exinit.c:95
>> #6  0x2040031c in boot_card (cmdline=0x0) at
>>
/home/reprofy/Projects/riscv/rtems/development/rtems/kernel/rtems-riscv/c/src/lib/libbsp/riscv32/hifive1/../../shared/bootcard.c:76
>> #7  0xffffcd98 in ?? ()
>>
>> Is RTEMS trying to allocate 2976696 bytes?
>> It seems to me, that .data region is not properly initialized. What do
you
>> think about this?
>>
>> 2017-06-18 1:31 GMT+03:00 Denis Obrezkov <denisobrezkov at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> 2017-06-17 22:11 GMT+03:00 Denis Obrezkov <denisobrezkov at gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Can you run RTEMS hello world? Or does printf make that too large? If
>>>>> that is
>>>>> too large, you need to force the tests to switch to printk(). There is
>>>>> some magic
>>>>> in testsuites/configure.ac for that.
>>>>>
>>>>> The low ticker examples (especially the last one) will show configure
>>>>> options
>>>>> to cut memory use.
>>>>>
>>>>> But these are hacks on individual tests. If there is a simulator which
>>>>> has interrupts,
>>>>> I would be testing on it since you will be battling the architecture
>>>>> not a RAM limit.
>>>>> Your project is the port not to put RTEMS into a tiny memory space. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> --joel
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Regards, Denis Obrezkov
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I was able to run the low ticker example further than in my earlier
>>>> attempts.
>>>>
>>>> But now I have a problem with it:
>>>> #0  memset (m=0xb98a0641, c=0, n=102) at
>>>> ../../../../../gcc-7.1.0/newlib/libc/string/memset.c:62
>>>> #1  0x20403168 in _Heap_Initialize (heap=0xb98a0641,
>>>> heap_area_begin_ptr=0x80002456, heap_area_size=7082, page_size=8)
>>>>     at
>>>>
/home/reprofy/Projects/riscv/rtems/development/rtems/kernel/rtems-riscv/c/src/../../cpukit/score/src/heap.c:230
>>>> #2  0x20400954 in RTEMS_Malloc_Initialize (areas=0x80003f78,
>>>> area_count=1, extend=0x0)
>>>>     at
>>>>
/home/reprofy/Projects/riscv/rtems/development/rtems/kernel/rtems-riscv/c/src/../../cpukit/libcsupport/src/malloc_initialize.c:40
>>>> #3  0x20400378 in bsp_work_area_initialize_default
>>>> (area_begin=0x80000e10, area_size=12784) at
>>>> ../../../../../.././hifive1/lib/include/bsp/bootcard.h:158
>>>> #4  0x204003c0 in bsp_work_area_initialize () at
>>>>
/home/reprofy/Projects/riscv/rtems/development/rtems/kernel/rtems-riscv/c/src/lib/libbsp/riscv32/hifive1/../../shared/bspgetworkarea.c:61
>>>> #5  0x204021bc in rtems_initialize_executive () at
>>>>
/home/reprofy/Projects/riscv/rtems/development/rtems/kernel/rtems-riscv/c/src/../../cpukit/sapi/src/exinit.c:95
>>>> #6  0x2040031c in boot_card (cmdline=0x0) at
>>>>
/home/reprofy/Projects/riscv/rtems/development/rtems/kernel/rtems-riscv/c/src/lib/libbsp/riscv32/hifive1/../../shared/bootcard.c:76
>>>> #7  0x20400064 in _end_clear_bss () at
>>>>
/home/reprofy/Projects/riscv/rtems/development/rtems/kernel/rtems-riscv/c/src/lib/libbsp/riscv32/hifive1/start/start.S:116
>>>>
>>>> I want to figure out, why it wants to use memset on these addresses,
>>>> because 0x80004000 is the maximum available address.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards, Denis Obrezkov
>>>
>>>
>>> I was able to proceed further after adding
>>> #define CONFIGURE_UNIFIED_WORK_AREAS
>>> to init.c of low_ticker example.
>>> Now I get an error:
>>> #0  0x2040d940 in _Chain_Initialize_node (the_node=0x80003ec0) at
>>> ../../cpukit/../../../hifive1/lib/include/rtems/score/chainimpl.h:127
>>> #1  0x2040da82 in _Chain_Iterator_initialize (the_chain=0x80000320
>>> <_User_extensions_List>, the_registry=0x8000032c
<_User_extensions_List+12>,
>>> the_iterator=0x80003ec0,
>>>     direction=CHAIN_ITERATOR_FORWARD) at
>>> ../../cpukit/../../../hifive1/lib/include/rtems/score/chainimpl.h:1049
>>> #2  0x2040de90 in _User_extensions_Iterate (arg=0x80003f18,
>>> visitor=0x2040dd48 <_User_extensions_Fatal_visitor>,
>>> direction=CHAIN_ITERATOR_FORWARD)
>>>     at
>>>
/home/reprofy/Projects/riscv/rtems/development/rtems/kernel/rtems-riscv/c/src/../../cpukit/score/src/userextiterate.c:174
>>> #3  0x204036c4 in _User_extensions_Fatal (source=INTERNAL_ERROR_CORE,
>>> error=4) at
>>> ../../cpukit/../../../hifive1/lib/include/rtems/score/userextimpl.h:307
>>> #4  0x204036e8 in _Terminate (the_source=INTERNAL_ERROR_CORE,
>>> the_error=4) at
>>>
/home/reprofy/Projects/riscv/rtems/development/rtems/kernel/rtems-riscv/c/src/../../cpukit/score/src/interr.c:35
>>> #5  0x20403730 in _Internal_error
>>> (core_error=INTERNAL_ERROR_INTERRUPT_STACK_TOO_SMALL)
>>>     at
>>>
/home/reprofy/Projects/riscv/rtems/development/rtems/kernel/rtems-riscv/c/src/../../cpukit/score/src/interr.c:44
>>> #6  0x20403824 in _ISR_Handler_initialization () at
>>>
/home/reprofy/Projects/riscv/rtems/development/rtems/kernel/rtems-riscv/c/src/../../cpukit/score/src/isr.c:51
>>> #7  0x20402170 in rtems_initialize_data_structures () at
>>>
/home/reprofy/Projects/riscv/rtems/development/rtems/kernel/rtems-riscv/c/src/../../cpukit/sapi/src/exinit.c:82
>>> #8  0x204021bc in rtems_initialize_executive () at
>>>
/home/reprofy/Projects/riscv/rtems/development/rtems/kernel/rtems-riscv/c/src/../../cpukit/sapi/src/exinit.c:95
>>> #9  0x2040031c in boot_card (cmdline=0x0) at
>>>
/home/reprofy/Projects/riscv/rtems/development/rtems/kernel/rtems-riscv/c/src/lib/libbsp/riscv32/hifive1/../../shared/bootcard.c:76
>>> #10 0xffffcd98 in ?? ()
>>>
>>> And I found out that rtems_minimum_stack_size variable is 0xab817bb3.
>>> And I don't know why - in the low ticker example it is set to 512.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards, Denis Obrezkov
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards, Denis Obrezkov
>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards, Denis Obrezkov



-- 
Hesham
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20170620/c6a0dde6/attachment.html>


More information about the devel mailing list