[PATCH 0/3] Split off powerpcspe from rs6000 port
sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
Tue May 16 13:48:58 UTC 2017
On 16/05/17 15:45, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 8:28 AM, Sebastian Huber
> <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
> I guess for RTEMS we should use "powerpcspe-rtems*-*". Is it
> possible to use the RTEMS "powerpc" directories with such a
> target? We had an "arm-rtemseabi*" maybe due to some
> configure/automake limitations. So, maybe "powerpc-rtemsspe*"?
> I personally think the GCC discussions which put SPE as part of the OS
> name are
> horribly incorrect. SPE is an architecture variant and the pattern for
> triples is very well defined. The pattern is
> I would prefer powerpcspe-rtemsVERSION.
> On the sharing the code issue, how much gets shared? How do you envision
> this impacting the RTEMS tree? Split the PowerPC port like GCC? Or just
> somehow magically build the same powerpc directories two different ways?
The reason for this split in GCC is that IBM is no longer willing to
maintain the stuff from Freescale/NXP/Qualcomm. There is no reason to do
this split in RTEMS.
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
More information about the devel