GSOC student question
beng at shrike-systems.com
Fri May 26 14:59:20 UTC 2017
On 05/22/2017 11:56 AM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org
> <mailto:gedare at rtems.org>> wrote:
> I think the i2c was developed and tested only on the BeagleBone Black.
> I don't think anyone has used the xm yet, though I could be mistaken.
> Yes, I believe the old one should be replaced by the updated version.
> This is likely a stupid question. Do we have confidence that the new
> i2c works
> on all platforms that the old one did?
The previous i2c implementation in the beagle bsp never worked on
hardware, only to a limited degree in qemu; replacing it won't make
anything worse for anyone.
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Sichen Zhao
> <zsc19940506 at outlook.com <mailto:zsc19940506 at outlook.com>> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I am working on my GSOC project- Beaglebone BSP projects
> > There is a question, Is the code in beagle/misc/i2c.c for the
> beagle bone or
> > for the beagle xm or other processor?
> > I developed the i2c for Beaglebone Black(AM335X), So if i need
> remove the
> > old one i2c.c in misc when i send the patch?
> > Best Regards
> > Sichen Zhao
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel