[PATCH] tests: CONFIGURE_DISABLE_SMP_CONFIGURATION

[Chris Johns]

On 16/05/2017 18:35, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 16/05/17 10:28, Chris Johns wrote:
>> What we do need to do is make sure the test results express the true
>> state. If a test is broken it should fail. If it is tagged an
>> expected-fail we do not consider it a regression.
> 
> Loosing test coverage simply because a test uses a non-SMP feature 
> somehow is not really great.
> 

I am sorry you have lost me. If the test is for something not available 
when SMP is enabled why build it? This can be handled in the build 
system. If the test is using something not available on SMP and it can 
be written to work on SMP by not using that feature then the test is 
broken on SMP and I would expect a fail until it is fixed.

Chris