Self-contained POSIX synchronization objects for RTEMS 4.12?
gedare at rtems.org
Wed Oct 4 14:36:08 UTC 2017
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 5:39 AM, Sebastian Huber
<sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 15/09/17 14:56, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>> the next Newlib snapshot will introduce a 64-bit time_t which makes this
>> tool chain ABI incompatible to all previous versions and forces a
>> re-compilation of all object files (RTEMS, libraries, applications). This
>> would be a good opportunity to also introduce the self-contained POSIX
>> synchronization objects:
>> What do you think about this? Anyway we should make the RTEMS 4.12 branch
>> with the next Newlib snapshot.
> I am now done with this stuff. Any comments to the patches sent for review?
> I would like to start integrating it.
It's too much for me to review individually. I skimmed and saw the
general pattern and it looks good. I'm a bit worried about adequate
testing before the release, but we should proceed. I haven't seen a
real timeline on the release yet any way.
> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
> Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
> Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
> E-Mail : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
> PGP : Public key available on request.
> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
More information about the devel