Some problems with the libbsd update

[Chris Johns]

On 22/08/2018 22:25, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 22/08/18 14:06, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, 6:47 AM Sebastian Huber
>> <sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
>> <mailto:sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
>>
>> It really is necessary to know how the other architectures implement it. Some
>> may turn out to be easy. Others like Epiphany and new may never matter.
> 
> If the niche architectures don't use libbsd (which I guess is the case), then
> there is no issue at all.
> 

Do we document what is supported and what is not supported?

Does libbsd have suitable checks on the built RTEMS to know it cannot be supported?

FWIW I do not think the idea of "one size fits all" is workable. I think a
number of architectures would benefit from a different smaller networking stack.

Chris