License for psxhdrs files

[Marçal]

I think you just have to clone the rtems repo and search for the files you
wrote and licensed. Then replace the license there is with the one on the
link.

Marçal (Sal)

On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 7:40 PM Shashvat Jain <shashvatjain2002 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> How will we edit all the test files to have the new license paragraph ?
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:05 AM Shashvat Jain <shashvatjain2002 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> yes sir , the psxtmtests also had the license paragraph , same as that of
>> the compliace tests
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 12:01 AM Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 12:21 PM Marçal <mcomajoancara at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I think we all have used that license because in the task instructions
>>>> in the wiki (
>>>> https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GCI/Coding/AddPOSIXMethodSignatureComplianceTests)
>>>> says so. Do I change the wiki to the new license?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes.
>>>
>>> And are the psxtmtests templates and tests the short license or the
>>> BSD-2? They may also be impacted.
>>>
>>> Marçal (Sal)
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 7:13 PM Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think I have cc'ed all of the GCI students who submitted code to
>>>>> psxhdrs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sebastian has asked that these files have 2 paragraph BSD which is
>>>>> quite
>>>>> similar to this one and makes the license consistent with other files.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/LICENSE.BSD-2-Clause
>>>>>
>>>>> I am in the process of merging the last GCI tasks in this category.
>>>>> Please submit
>>>>> a patch for all the files you wrote.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sebastian.. if I missed anyone, please reply and bring them in. Also
>>>>> just help
>>>>> get this resolved.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> --joel
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 8:16 AM Sebastian Huber <
>>>>> sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09/12/2018 22:41, Marçal Comajoan Cara wrote:
>>>>>> > + *  Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this
>>>>>> software
>>>>>> > + *  for any purpose with or without fee is hereby granted.
>>>>>> > + *
>>>>>> > + *  THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL
>>>>>> > + *  WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED
>>>>>> > + *  WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL
>>>>>> THE AUTHOR
>>>>>> > + *  BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
>>>>>> DAMAGES
>>>>>> > + *  OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR
>>>>>> PROFITS,
>>>>>> > + *  WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS
>>>>>> ACTION,
>>>>>> > + *  ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF
>>>>>> THIS SOFTWARE.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would it be possible to change this to BSD-2-Clause? New files
>>>>>> written
>>>>>> specifically for RTEMS should have the standard project license and
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> is BSD-2-Clause from my point of view.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
>>>>>> Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
>>>>>> Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
>>>>>> E-Mail  : sebastian.huber at embedded-brains.de
>>>>>> PGP     : Public key available on request.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>>> devel at rtems.org
>>>>>> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20181210/c0472874/attachment-0001.html>