SIS MP success
chrisj at rtems.org
Sat Dec 15 00:07:52 UTC 2018
On 14/12/18 8:48 pm, Jiri Gaisler wrote:
> OK, I will look into this over Christmas. I have some long flights
> coming up so it will be a good way to kill time ... :-)
Great. I have been on a few flights recently and I have been doing the same
thing. Power in the seats is nice and WiFi is even better.
That should not be happening. I will check this as part of some work I am planning.
These are typically crashes.
> Average test time: 0:00:00.498379
> Testing time : 0:05:20.956184
That is a nice run time.
If you add the --mail and related options (--mail-to, --mail-from, --smtp-host)
the results can be posted to build at rtems.org. We love seeing results being
posted by any and everyone.
> The four failing/invalid tests fail the same way on real hardware, so I
> am not too worried about this.
Is the failure seen without rtems-test?
I ask because I think there maybe a bug in rtems-test with a threading load when
running a number of simulations at once. I am not sure if this is a qemu
specific issue or a general one, I need to revisit it. I suspect a locking issue
in rtems-test and it can be seen with tests hanging and simulators showing 0
load in top.
On a non-smp build, I get the same fails,
> so it seems to be some issue with the tests...
There is a ticket open on 5.1 to have tests that do fail to be tagged as
"Expected Fail" so we can baseline what is expected. I cannot do this alone
because I am not sure which ones are expected failures.
More information about the devel