gdb 8.1 released
chrisj at rtems.org
Wed Jan 31 23:08:58 UTC 2018
On 01/02/2018 09:26, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org
> <mailto:chrisj at rtems.org>> wrote:
> On 01/02/2018 03:54, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Perfect timing. Just as the RSB was updated and we have built new tools. :)
> > Should we bump to 8.1? I would think it makes sense if it doesn't break anything.
> > Thoughts?
> Does "not break anything" mean getting test results posted and seeing there are
> no regressions?
> I wasn't thinking of formal testing.
We should considering doing this as we have the basic infrastructure, we just
need to link it together to make it happen.
> How would we stage this? A way could be adding a recipe to the RSB for 8.1 and a
> manual hack of defaults to build the tools then RTEMS.
> I honestly have no idea how we would do this with or without the RSB.
We build the tools using the RSB, we build RTEMS and then we run rtems-test on
tier 1 BSPs and post the results to build at rtems.org?
It would be nice to have the process part of the normal work flow, for example
we add a new recipe to the RSB, test the tools and then migrate to it if there
are no regressions.
More information about the devel