Thoughts on Reusing FreeBSD msun tests

[Joel Sherrill]

On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 2:02 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:

> Well, after this summer, maybe you can write a couple of
> paravirtualized x86_64 BSPs to run under *nix, *BSD, MacOS, and
> Windows to test newlib and rtems on native hosting.
>

I don't even know how to test newlib natively at this point. I assume make
check works.

The eventual goal is to have newlib coverage reports. So there is multiple
steps to
get there.


>
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
> > Sigh.. that makes things even more complex.
> >
> > As a general rule, we probably should just set a goal to run newlib
> > tests on an RTEMS BSP and help improve newlib's tests.
> >
> > --joel
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Relatedly, you may also want to read through
> >> https://sourceware.org/ml/newlib/2017/msg01216.html
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Joel Sherrill <joel at rtems.org> wrote:
> >> > Hi
> >> >
> >> > I can't find this on FreeBSD head but it looks like a decent
> >> > set of tests for fenv and other libm functionality.
> >> >
> >> > http://web.mit.edu/freebsd/head/tools/regression/lib/msun/
> >> >
> >> > Thoughts on incorporating this into our tests?
> >> >
> >> > --joel
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > devel mailing list
> >> > devel at rtems.org
> >> > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20180607/247db188/attachment-0002.html>