[PATCH 3/6] shgen: Import from RTEMS
Joel Sherrill
joel at rtems.org
Fri Jun 8 14:08:48 UTC 2018
I had an email some time ago with the developer of the SuperH
FPGA implementation (http://j-core.org/). Personally, I was close
to putting it on the deprecate list about the time I read about that
project. Seeing there would be an open implementation seemed a
reason to give it a lease on life.
I would be OK with marking it deprecated but don't particularly
like doing it retroactively. We already did a round of deprecation
for a number of architectures where 4.11 would be there last appearance.
I can't point to anyone who is an active user so even though
deprecating it bothers me on a process basis, I don't think
I have a technical objection.
On a random note, I suspect the m32c will obsolete itself for us
if it turns out that it gets dropped by gcc. It seems to be a
problematic port that stays broken.
--joel
On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 7:32 AM, Gedare Bloom <gedare at rtems.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 10:19 PM, Chris Johns <chrisj at rtems.org> wrote:
> > On 07/06/2018 16:11, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >> On 07/06/18 07:53, Chris Johns wrote:
> >>> On 07/06/2018 15:39, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >>>> Corresponding RTEMS commit is 75933d5d25cd50f80162b7a0d2f66a
> 5534e1763f.
> >>>>
> >>>> Update #3443.
> >>>> ---
> >>>> misc/shgen/AUTHORS | 3 +
> >>>> misc/shgen/COPYING | 340 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> +++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>> misc/shgen/TODO | 13 ++
> >>>> misc/shgen/sci.c | 177 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>> misc/shgen/sci.h | 11 ++
> >>>> misc/shgen/shgen.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++
> >>>> misc/wscript | 9 ++
> >>>> 7 files changed, 667 insertions(+)
> >>>> create mode 100644 misc/shgen/AUTHORS
> >>>> create mode 100644 misc/shgen/COPYING
> >>>> create mode 100644 misc/shgen/TODO
> >>>> create mode 100644 misc/shgen/sci.c
> >>>> create mode 100644 misc/shgen/sci.h
> >>>> create mode 100644 misc/shgen/shgen.c
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/misc/shgen/AUTHORS b/misc/shgen/AUTHORS
> >>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>> index 0000000..225c2fa
> >>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>> +++ b/misc/shgen/AUTHORS
> >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
> >>>> +Ralf Corsepius (corsepiu at faw.uni-ulm.de)
> >>>> + * Initial implementation
> >>>> + * generator for sci bitrate table
> >>>> diff --git a/misc/shgen/COPYING b/misc/shgen/COPYING
> >>>> new file mode 100644
> >>>> index 0000000..8cc2ef7
> >>>> --- /dev/null
> >>>> +++ b/misc/shgen/COPYING
> >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,340 @@
> >>>> +
> >>>> + GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
> >>> The RTEMS tools is almost clean of GPL code. There is a small piece in
> the
> >>> rtemstoolkit I would to replace but I have not done that yet.
> >>
> >> The nios2gen is also GPL (the RTEMS GPL with linking exception). Is
> this a
> >> problem?
> >
> > We are moving to a BSD-2 license so I assumed this is part of that
> change?
> >
> >> The GCC, GDB and Binutils are also GPL.
> >
> > They are not in this repo. It is about our repos and the compliance
> obligations
> > users have with our code base.
> >
> No, I think Sebastian's goal is to remove all host tools from the
> rtems.git.
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at rtems.org
> http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20180608/fad57807/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the devel
mailing list