[PATCH 1/4] Reassign system initilization order numbers

[Chris Johns]

On 18/06/2018 15:00, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 18/06/18 04:33, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 15/06/2018 21:13, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> Assign each system initialization step a number divisible by 256 to
>>> allow more easily future additions.  Keep the order as is.
>> Where are these initialization steps defined?
>>
>> I cannot see any supporting comments on how the current numbers are allocated?
> 
> The initialization steps were reverse engineered from exinit.c:
> 
> https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/cpukit/sapi/src/exinit.c?h=4.10
> 
> They are documented here (needs an update):
> 
> https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/c-user/initialization.html#initializing-rtems
> 

Thank you.
Chris